Washington Commanders vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats: Player Performance Insights

Washington Commanders vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats: Player Performance Insights

In this section, we’ll set the stage by summarizing the overall statistical landscape. The Commanders amassed 325 total yards—including 140 through the air and 185 on the ground—while the Eagles racked up 410 yards, split between 295 passing and 115 rushing. Turnovers were minimal, with each team recording just one interception. Time of possession favored Philadelphia at 32:18, highlighting their methodical drives and ability to sustain long possessions.

Offensive Standouts

Commanders’ Rushing Prowess

The Washington Commanders vs Philadelphia Eagles match player stats: Player Performance Insights emphasize the dynamic ground game led by Brian Robinson Jr. He carried the ball 20 times for 102 yards (5.1 yards per carry) and found the end zone once. Antonio Gibson complemented with 55 yards on 14 carries, breaking two tackles on a critical third-quarter drive. Sam Howell added 18 rushing yards on six scrambles, showcasing his mobility and ability to extend plays.

Eagles’ Aerial Efficiency

On the other sideline, the Eagles leaned on Jalen Hurts’ arm. According to the Washington Commanders vs Philadelphia Eagles match player stats: Player Performance Insights, Hurts completed 28 of 37 passes for 295 yards and three touchdowns, posting a quarterback rating of 112.5. A.J. Brown caught 9 passes for 135 yards, including a 42-yard bomb late in the second quarter. DeVonta Smith contributed 78 receiving yards on six catches, with a highlight reel sideline grab that set up a key field goal.

Defensive Heroes

Commanders’ Pass Rush

The Washington Commanders vs Philadelphia Eagles match player stats: Player Performance Insights show that Montez Sweat led the pass rush with 2.5 sacks, seven QB pressures, and one forced fumble. Ricky Person Jr. chipped in 1.5 sacks and three tackles for loss, collapsing the pocket and disrupting Hurts’ timing. In the secondary, Kendall Fuller recorded two pass breakups and one interception, halting a critical third-down attempt in the fourth quarter.

Eagles’ Turnover Generators

Philadelphia’s defense answered in kind. Brandon Graham tallied eight total tackles, two sacks, and a forced fumble that changed field position in the third quarter. Javon Hargrave added six tackles and 1.5 tackles for loss, while Darius Slay snagged the interception off a tipped ball, finishing with five tackles and a pass defensed. These contributions highlight how the Eagles’ front seven and secondary worked in tandem to stifle key drives.

Quarterback Duel Insights

Sam Howell’s Poise and Progress

Sam Howell faced relentless pressure but managed 215 passing yards on 19 completions from 29 attempts, throwing one touchdown and one interception. His passer rating of 78.4 reflected growing confidence in the pocket. Howell’s best moment came on a clutch third-down scramble for 16 yards, keeping alive a drive that resulted in Washington’s sole passing touchdown.

Jalen Hurts’ Dual-Threat Impact

Jalen Hurts once again demonstrated his dual-threat capabilities. Besides his 295 passing yards, he gained 53 rushing yards on eight carries, including a 21-yard run that set up a touchdown late in the first half. His ability to buy time and choose downfield targets elevated the Eagles’ offensive efficiency, as highlighted in the Washington Commanders vs Philadelphia Eagles match player stats: Player Performance Insights.

Skill Position Breakdown

Wide Receivers

  • Terry McLaurin (WAS): 7 receptions, 89 yards, 1 TD – showcased crisp route-running and contested-catch ability.

  • John Metchie III (PHI): 5 catches, 72 yards – his speed opened lanes against man coverage.

Running Backs

  • Brian Robinson Jr. (WAS): 102 rushing yards, 1 TD, 3 receptions for 18 yards – balanced workload on early-downs.

  • Miles Sanders (PHI): 68 rushing yards, 1 TD, 4 receptions for 28 yards – effective in short-yardage and passing downs.

Special Teams and Situational Plays

Kicking and Punting

  • Jake Elliott (PHI): 3 field goals, including a 49-yard kick as time expired in the first half.

  • Cameron Johnston (PHI): 4 punts, 2 inside the 20, average of 45 yards per punt.

Returns and Coverage

  • Jahan Dotson (WAS): 2 punt returns averaging 24 yards, sparking field position advantages.

  • Quez Watkins (PHI): 1 kickoff return for 28 yards, igniting a touchdown drive.

Critical Matchups and Game-Changing Moments

  • Red Zone Efficiency: Washington converted 3 of 4 red zone trips into touchdowns, while Philadelphia made 4 of 5.

  • Third-Down Defense: Philadelphia held the Commanders to 2 of 9 third-down conversions in the second half.

  • Big Play Differential: Eagles recorded five plays of 20+ yards, compared to Washington’s three, swinging momentum at key junctures.

Future Implications

The Washington Commanders vs Philadelphia Eagles match player stats: Player Performance Insights not only recap a captivating contest but also hint at trajectories for both squads. Commanders’ young core—led by Howell and Robinson Jr.—continues to grow under pressure, while the Eagles’ balance of veteran playmakers and emerging defensive talent positions them as contenders for postseason success. Fantasy managers might target sleepers like John Metchie III and Emmanuel Forbes, whose breakout moments signaled promising upside.

Conclusion

Reviewing the washington commanders vs philadelphia eagles match player stats underscores the multifaceted nature of NFL competition. Washington’s potent rushing tandem and opportunistic defense clashed with Philadelphia’s efficient passing attack and stout special teams. The interplay between emerging rookies and seasoned veterans added depth to each roster, making this matchup a showcase of both present prowess and future promise. Whether through a game-altering sack, a clutch third-down conversion, or a pinpoint field goal, every statistic tells a story of commitment, skill, and the relentless pursuit of victory.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *